OpEd with Rep. Lamar Smith in Houston Chronicle on our new bill to strengthen the visa security process http://bit.ly/aah6pK
Posted on Twitter
about 6 hours ago

What Do You Think of the Stabilization Package?

Thanks to those of you who have left us your thoughts on the stabilization packagePlease use this thread to continue the discussion.

Supportive blogger John Henry Medina has the Senator's statement on the plan here.

Receive campaign updates to your mobile device by texting "Follow JohnCornyn" to 40404.

If you haven't registered to vote already, there's a week left. Head over here to find out where you can register to vote.

We'll be unveiling something new online later today so be sure to check back.

 

Comments

Anthony Wright said…
Great message sent for bipartisan cooperation Senator.  I believe by House Republicans willing to swallow a little pride and vote for this bill will benefit everyone in the long run.
John Wiseman said…
I know how hard it is to go against party lines but you did the right thing Senator, something needed to be done IMMEDIATELY and if this bill wasn't passed I don't know what would have happened.
Chris Reed said…

This second bill is more more palatable than the first, the addition I like the best is the taxpayer protection idea.

Thank you for taking action Senator.

Tom Franks said…

Thank you Sen. for voting in favor of the package.  If Congress waited any longer more severe repercussions would have arisen. 

Also want to thank you for going to against usual party lines and acting on your belief system and not that of the party.

 

Cornyn 08

Tony Allen said…

Dear Senator,

 Do vote for any federal government interference in the market. Let market forces work out the excesses built into the system by socialist policies of the Federal government. Any more government interference or injection of public funds into the financial system will only prolong the current problems.  A recession or even a depression is the best way to put the financial system into lsustainable health.  I am over 65, have about 1 million in the markets, retired military and still working at $7.50/hr.  I will consider moving my assets out of the market if public money is used to prop up this market especially if government oversight is used to oversee the conduct of the market.  I have more faith in a greedy free market than in a market that is subject to the political, corrupt whims of the federal government.

 

Sincerely,

 

Tony Allen

Groesbeck, Texas

Lise said…

No bail out.  If it gets harder to obtain credit, so be it.  If there's a depression/rescession coming, so be it.  This is nothing short of socialism and appeasement.  We're supposed to capitalists.  No one put a gun to anyone's head to participate in home buying, lending, or investing in these mortgage backed securities.  The foreclosures are not a total loss.  There are tangible assets and at some point the housing market will recover.  Let private investors and/or creditors take these assets whenever there are failures.  The government has NO business bailing anyone out.  There needs to be thorugh criminal investigations and people need to go to jail for any material misrepresentations.  Anyway, if the government wants to engage in hand outs, pass out government cheese again!

Don Van Zandt said…

The latest cosmetic changes to this plan are ridiculous. Change the FDIC insurance for 12 months and then everyone has to scramble to move the money. $700B is still there.

Kill capital gains, suspend mark to market and let the chips fall where they will. I am tired of letting people and companies avoid personal responsibility.

I am going to be hurt financially if you print an extra $700B or if the job market is softer. Companies that lived from loan to ever bigger loan need to go out of business.

We will survive and be better for it.

Marcus Mateus said…
Jim Thomas, above, couldn't be more right.  Privatize Fannie & Freddie, and let the markets work this thing out.  I am not afraid of a recession, they help clean out underperforming value destroyers.  I think we need the equivalent of that for congress!
Chase Wilson said…
Please do not vote for this plan. Congress can help, but this plan is the WRONG plan. Instead, I submit the following three steps: Common Sense Plan. I. INSURANCE A. Insure the subprime bonds/mortgages with an underlying FHA-type insurance. Government-insured and backed loans would have an instant market all over the world, creating immediate and needed liquidity. B. In order for a company to accept the government-backed insurance, they must do two things: 1. Rewrite any mortgage that is more than three months delinquent to a 6% fixed-rate mortgage. a. Roll all back payments with no late fees or legal costs into the balance. This brings homeowners current and allows them a chance to keep their homes. b. Cancel all prepayment penalties to encourage refinancing or the sale of the property to pay off the bad loan. In the event of foreclosure or short sale, the borrower will not be held liable for any deficit balance. FHA does this now, and that encourages mortgage companies to go the extra mile while working with the borrower—again limiting foreclosures and ruined lives. 2. Cancel ALL golden parachutes of EXISTING and FUTURE CEOs and executive team members as long as the company holds these government-insured bonds/mortgages. This keeps under-performing executives from being paid when they don’t do their jobs. This backstop will cost less than $50 billion—a small fraction of the current proposal. II. Remove mark to market accounting rules for two years on only subprime Tier III bonds/mortgages. This keeps companies from being forced to artificially mark down bonds/mortgages below the value of the underlying mortgages and real estate. Remove the capital gains tax completely. Investors will flood the real estate and stock market in search of tax-free profits, creating tremendous—and immediate—liquidity in the markets. Again, this costs the taxpayer nothing.
Chase Wilson said…
Please do not vote for this plan. Congress can help, but this plan is the WRONG plan. Years of bad decisions and stupid mistakes have created an economic nightmare in this country, but $700 billion in new debt is not the answer. As a tax-paying American citizen, I will not support any congressperson who votes to implement such a policy. Instead, I submit the following three steps: Common Sense Plan. I. INSURANCE A. Insure the subprime bonds/mortgages with an underlying FHA-type insurance. Government-insured and backed loans would have an instant market all over the world, creating immediate and needed liquidity. B. In order for a company to accept the government-backed insurance, they must do two things: 1. Rewrite any mortgage that is more than three months delinquent to a 6% fixed-rate mortgage. a. Roll all back payments with no late fees or legal costs into the balance. This brings homeowners current and allows them a chance to keep their homes. b. Cancel all prepayment penalties to encourage refinancing or the sale of the property to pay off the bad loan. In the event of foreclosure or short sale, the borrower will not be held liable for any deficit balance. FHA does this now, and that encourages mortgage companies to go the extra mile while working with the borrower—again limiting foreclosures and ruined lives. 2. Cancel ALL golden parachutes of EXISTING and FUTURE CEOs and executive team members as long as the company holds these government-insured bonds/mortgages. This keeps under-performing executives from being paid when they don’t do their jobs. C. This backstop will cost less than $50 billion—a small fraction of the current proposal. II. MARK TO MARKET A. Remove mark to market accounting rules for two years on only subprime Tier III bonds/mortgages. This keeps companies from being forced to artificially mark down bonds/mortgages below the value of the underlying mortgages and real estate. B. This move creates patience in the market and has an immediate stabilizing effect on failing and ailing banks—and it costs the taxpayer nothing. III. CAPITAL GAINS TAX A. Remove the capital gains tax completely. Investors will flood the real estate and stock market in search of tax-free profits, creating tremendous—and immediate—liquidity in the markets. Again, this costs the taxpayer nothing. B. This move will be seen as a lightning rod politically because many will say it is helping the rich. The truth is the rich will benefit, but it will be their money that stimulates the economy. This will enable all Americans to have more stable jobs and retirement investments that go up instead of down. This is not a time for envy, and it’s not a time for politics. It’s time for all of us, as Americans, to stand up, speak out, and fix this mess.
Matt said…
Please do not vote for ANY sort of government assistance or bailout for these companies.  You are only delaying the inevitable.  These companies need to fail in order for the free market to work as it should.  If that means a prolonged economic downturn, so be it.  I am sick and tired of people not taking responsiblity for their actions and rewarding their poor choices with a safety net provided by the American taxpayer. 
Stephen said…

Since I can't email via the senate website or call in to Dc(all circuits busy for HOURs)

I must say, DO NOT vote for this plan in any name or form. We the people will not be fooled by calling it a 'rescue' plan or anything else of the like.

 The Federal Reserve and Treasury to not need expanded powers, and one should evaluate that zero reserve banking policy as well, it will lead to further problems in the future!

Norman Binkley said…
I am opposed to this bail out under any circumstances.
Sally Krash said…
Please vote no on the bailout package. Do not let the used car salesmen/women on Capitol Hill sell your taxpayers a LEMON! Do you not see that Citibank just bought Wachovia and JP Morgan Chase just bought WAMU? This intervention is not needed. The private sector can correct this problem! I am willing to take it on the chin now, if necessary, in order to preserve our democratic way of life for MY CHILDREN! There is something serously wrong when a democracy has to borrow money from a communist country to survive. This must stop! Let the irresponsibe institutions go under. They will be taken over by more fiscally responsible organizations. STUDY the depression. The problem was not the crash of the stock market, it was governments overreaction and interference that caused the depression. NO ONE that I know is for this BAILOUT. VOTE NO!
Winnie Cammack said…

Do not vote for the bail out plan !!!

amf said…
i am against the bailout. please vote no
Pete Macabbe said…
Thank you Sen. for opposing the governments bail out of Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac, this companies were inflating their profits for years and deserve what is coming. 
John Freedman said…

Couldn't agree with you more Phillip.  The CEOs were earning millions upon millons and new this was going on.  There is no way the avergae hardworking american citizens should have to pay for this. 

 

But we need Congress to make a decision soon, our economy can't afford months of deliberation or things are only going to get worse.

Bloggers for Cornyn

Want to display a button in support of John Cornyn on your blog? Click here to choose one!

The opinions expressed by the bloggers on this site and those providing comments are theirs alone, and do not reflect the opinions of the Texans for Senator John Cornyn. Texans for Senator John Cornyn is not responsible for the accuracy of any of the information supplied by the bloggers.